Because clergy and parishes differ in their approaches to baptising the children of unmarried couples, it is difficult for orthodox clergy on the ground to form a shield-wall with others on this key theological, moral and social issue.
This is not the place for a long theological discourse on the nature of baptism. The core issue here relates to the public promises that couples who bring children for baptism make: I turn to Christ as Saviour; I submit to Christ as Lord; I come to Christ the way, the truth and the life.
In conscience Cranmer's Curate could not participate in an act of corporate worship where individuals are publicly declaring their submission to Christ as Lord when they are clearly disregarding His biblical teaching that heterosexual, monogamous, life-long marriage is the only right context for the expression of sexual love and the procreation of children. Cohabiting couples and couples in civil partnerships bringing children for baptism are by definition unable to say with integrity: I submit to Christ as Lord.
The Book of Common Prayer in the Solemnization of Matrimony states clearly that the causes for which marriage was ordained were:
1). ‘The procreation of children, to be brought up in the fear and nurture of the Lord, and to the praise of his holy Name.’
2). ‘For a remedy against sin, and to avoid fornication; that such persons as have not the gift of continency might marry, and keep themselves undefiled members of Christ’s body.’
3). ‘For the mutual society, help and comfort, that the one ought to have of the other, both in prosperity and adversity.’
Canon A5 clearly affirms that the Book of Common Prayer expresses the biblical doctrine of the Church of England and therefore to participate in the baptism of the children of cohabiting couples or of those in civil partnerships is in fact uncanonical. It is to sanction what both Holy Scripture and Anglican teaching calls ‘fornication’.
Ecumenically, such action undermines faithful Christians including those in Roman Catholic adoption agencies who, when the Sexual Orientation Regulations were being imposed, took such a courageous stand for the God-given institution of heterosexual marriage as the right context for the nurture of children.
More widely within society, it is also clear that the assault on the institution of marriage since the 1960s has unleashed a tidal wave of toxic evil on our nation, spiritually, morally and socially. The Church of the nation is called to serve the nation and upholding an institution that a loving God created for the good of humanity is a vital aspect of that service.
Like most clergy Cranmer's Curate sincerely wishes to enjoy peaceable relations with people particularly in the local community he is called to serve, and in his experience most cohabiting couples are willing to have a celebratory service of thanksgiving in which their children are blessed. In conscience cc must by God’s grace uphold the Lordship of Christ if he is to have integrity both as a Christian and as an ordained minister.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
This is the kind of helpful difficult parish challenge that we ordinands could do with some help working through. Thanks. P
ReplyDeleteHi Julian
ReplyDeleteI'm 100% with you on the importance of marriage, and I agree that the thanksgiving service is an ideal offering to those who cannot in conscience make the declarations required at baptism.
However, in the Spirit of Romans 2 verse 4, I do baptise the children of unmarried (heterosexual) couples (not sure civil partnerships are applicable to hetero couples, which makes them discrimiatory, but I digress). God's kindness, Christ's inclusion of the sinful and (personally) the conviction of the Spirit have led me to this decision.
My justification is as follows:-
In any church there will be people "in process" i.e. on the journey of discovery that results in (but does not end with) commitment to Christ as Lord. We do not expect people to conform to the values of the Kingdom before we will allow them to be part of the church; it is in belonging that they come to believe, and then (by the transforming grace of God by Word and Spirit) their behaviour is aligned to Kingdom values.
I hold baptism to be declarative rather than causitive of the grace of God, and so I am happy not only to affirm that the gift of Jesus is held in trust by a child's parents and godparents until they can decide for themselves to take on a personal commitment to Him, but also that, having made these promises (e'g' of submission to Christ) the parents have a responsibility to live up to them (and so for example, I invite them to talk to us about getting married.)
I have found this to be a fruitful approach to the issue and I commend it to Cranmer's curate and the youth group
in peace
Tim
Given that you are a CofE vicar, do you refer those you cannot work with to others within the Established church who have a different view? After all, all British citizens do have a right to access baptism, in line with the provisions of establishment.
ReplyDelete