Evangelicals Now exposing elitism in evangelistic strategy is a significant intervention and could be a game-changer. But the issues he rightly raises could flare up into class war if we evangelicals are not prayerfully careful.
Mr Carswell writes:
It seems to me that, in the UK, the parts which need the most attention as far as the gospel is concerned are receiving least. Frankly, I am burdened that there is an evangelical elitism which steers us away from less appealing corners of the harvest fields.
He then describes an attempt to recruit helpers for a mission at Bradford University compared with a similar effort at Oxford:
A few years ago I was asked to speak at a week-long mission at Bradford University. They appealed for helpers - CU guests as they are called - but had no responses. Bradford University is extremely multi-cultural, dominated by Islam. A tiny group of Christians worked hard to reach the thousands in the university, but we were very limited in what we could do. The week after the mission in Bradford I moved on to Oxford University for their tri-annual mission, where there were 64 college guests for the week. Praise God for them and their willingness to help, but why were there none in Bradford?
The answer to Mr Carswell's question lies in the history of English evangelicalism. Late Victorian evangelical leaders, such as Bishop JC Ryle, focussed on Oxbridge as a way of counter-acting the rise of Anglo-Catholicism in the academy in which the English ruling elite were being educated.
In the 20th century this 'reach-the-few-to-reach-the-many' strategy led Oxbridge-educated evangelicals to focus on evangelism in the English public schools since these institutions were, and to a significant extent still are, the main feeders into Oxbridge. Though the Revd EJH Nash who founded the Iwerne ministry to the top public schools in the 1930s was not from an elite background himself, that does not alter the fact that he was pursuing the logic of Ryle's strategy. And anyway the evangelical leaders 'Bash' nurtured were from the requisite social background.
Now, however, evangelical leaders educated and converted post the social revolution of the 1960s are emerging who are seriously challenging the received late Victorian strategy while others remain tied to it. Therein lies the potential division.
Evangelicals who move out of the comfort zones could start feeling proud of themselves, looking down Pharisee-like on their brothers and sisters who continue to minister in the evangelical strongholds of the 'strategic' areas.
Evangelicals ministering in better-resourced settings could start feeling defensive, arguing that their brothers and sisters do not appreciate the complexities of larger set-ups or even accusing them of professional envy.
For the sake of evangelical unity, we need to remind ourselves of some non-negotiables:
1). The growth of Christ's Kingdom is what we should be passionate about, not the growth of our little kingdoms of influence whether up north or down south.
2). God's gospel of eternal salvation is for every sinner whom Christ calls to repentance, whether they live in Bradford or Battersea, Mayfair or Middlesborough.
3). No part of the harvest field is superior to another.
4). Gospel ministry is a vocation not a career.
On a practical front, it would enormously help to build a stronger culture of transferability in English evangelicalism if our ministers moved away from the practice of staying for a long time in large churches in affluent areas whilst ministering for a short time in small churches in less affluent areas.
An evangelical incumbent of a large university or suburban church who moved to a smaller church and led it into growth would set a really helpful precedent.
There is certainly no reason for curates staying in a large church for longer than three or four years before moving to a turn-around incumbency.
This issue is not going to go away. There is no excuse for the current inequity in resourcing Mr Carswell eloquently highlights. But we evangelicals do need to pray that we do not degenerate into an ungodly and damaging class war over evangelistic strategy.
Cranmer's Curate is blogging off for the next week or so to concentrate on the task of delivering his church's new magazine to every home in the parish. Youth group prayers for the effective functioning of cc's feet would be appreciated.
"a turn-around incumbency"
ReplyDeleteI like this phrase Julian! However, I wonder what expectation there is in 'Evangelical' theological colleges for some ordinands to be called to this as a specific ministry? It is possible under God to move a congregation on from a gathering of 20 souls in a 'High and Dry' rural church to one of 80 in an active, reaching-out Christian community. It does entail "tears, toil and sweat"! The "Blood" was shed 'once for all' on the cross and if that is faithfully preached, taught and 'caught' the harvest belongs to the Lord.
Every blessing on your ministry!
Terry
A very insightful article. You might want to take a look at an article that was written about how some church planting in done here in the states.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2011/may/urbanplanters.html
this article seems to echo some of the things that both of you are saying. My take on this is that a lot of this is human nature. Would you rather plant a church in a rich neighborhood or a poor one? And who would you rather hang out with. Its a difficult question that many church planters, and their leaders are going to have to be honest with. Its hip to plant churches in trendy neighborhoods, but if all your reaching is disaffected Christians, were is the real evangelism happening?
An excellent idea for directing, or at least nudging vocational development. Here at Canford Magna (yes, Dorset) in 1971 we had typically less than 10 worshippers. After Canon John Collins arrived from St Mark's, Gillingham, the growth that was unleashed now has well over 500 worshippers in three churches. More importantly we have produced 20 vocations in those years since then, many of whom serve in rural or small urban churches which are then themselves often growing, totally against the trend. Why is "Career planning and praying" (yes, I know it is a vocation!) not taught better to ordinands either in college or as part of their IME training?
ReplyDeleteJohn Waldsax
I thought many clergy stayed in the same place for a long time because of their children's schooling, wife/husband's job, etc. ... Celibacy, perhaps ...?
ReplyDeleteI find the latest Reform video on AM this morning interesting. Jonathan Fletcher talks about revival coming in the 18th century by people going to apparently non-strategic places, and the current necessity of filling the pulpits of UPAs with Bible teachers. So how is Reform intending to put this into practice?
ReplyDeletewere is john collings reverand now tony fisk
ReplyDelete