The permissive society is seriously damaging the stability of the United Kingdom and is grossly unjust to the UK tax payer in the following ways:
• The growth in the proportion of children born outside the God-created institution of holy matrimony since the 1960s has fuelled welfare dependency and undermined the moral importance of working for a living;
• The proliferation of sexually transmitted diseases has damaged public health and become an increasing financial burden on the National Health Service;
• The denigration of fatherhood and of the importance of positive male role models has fuelled the growth in criminal activity by teenage boys;
• The culture of easy divorceism has hugely damaged the emotional health of the children affected and undermined their educational performance;
• The refusal to execute justice upon murderers by capital punishment has contributed to the trivialisation of evil and the banishment of the fear of God;
• The decision to allow abortion virtually on demand has fuelled a culture of moral uncertainty over the value and ownership by God of human life.
The virtues the permissive society hates – faithfulness in marriage, sexual restraint, leadership by men in the home, the work ethic, the State wielding the sword of justice, reverence for the image of God in all humanity, including the unborn – are clearly set forth in the New Testament.
So why don't we hear Christ’s ministers of the gospel prophetically commending such virtues more often from their platform in Parliament and denouncing wickedness and vice?
Being clear on the difference between virtue and vice is surely integral to an ordained minister's calling to proclaim God's glorious gospel of eternal salvation through faith in Jesus Christ.
Without such clarity, how can he effectively proclaim the reality of God’s wrath on sin and the full, perfect, and sufficient sacrifice, oblation and satisfaction the Lord Jesus Christ made on the Cross for the sins of the whole world?
This article by cc about the Anglican Mission in England and the southernisation of evangelicalism appeared in Friday's Church of England Newspaper.
Cranmer's Curate warmly commends this excellent article in support of AMiE by the Revd Richard Coekin, director of the Co-Mission church planting initiative in south London. The three English clergy ordained in Kenya are Co-Mission staff members. Mr Coekin lucidly explains the rationale for these ordinations.
Your curate is not blogging for the rest of July due to his summer holidays. He leaves the youth group with today's BCP Collect (Trinity 4):
O God, the protector of all that trust in thee, without whom nothing is strong, nothing is holy; Increase and multiply upon us thy mercy; that, thou being our ruler and guide, we may so pass through things temporal, that we finally lose not the things eternal: Grant this, O heavenly Father, for Jesus Christ's sake our Lord. Amen.
Julian, I am shocked that any clergyman can advocate the return of capital punishment, which is surely completely contrary to every christian principle. It's hard to square it with your next point about abortion. Look at how many miscarriages of justice there have been in the last 40 years. Perhaps you'd be happy to go round apologising to the families of people who had been wrongly hanged and say "sorry, it's the price we have to pay to keep the fear of God in our nation".
ReplyDeleteBut I do agree with your other points, although I'm not sure that STDs have damaged public health and are a drain on the NHS.
The separation of church and state is something long overdue. You, the Vatican and Iran are the only places with clergy automatically in the government.
ReplyDeleteThe shocking thing is that Harold Shipman was allowed to exercise control by committing suicide in jail rather than the State depriving him of his autonomy by hanging him, which is what his deeds deserved.
ReplyDeleteIt would also be shocking if the Norwegian mass murderer were released from jail in his 50s and given a new identity.
I agree with everything cc says in this excellent post.
ReplyDelete"so why won't bishops in Parliament speak up more prophetically against (the permissive society's) various manifestations?" Oh, if only!
With respect to Ian S's remark about hard to square support for capital punishment for murder with opposition to abortion, surely equivalence between convicted murderers and unborn children is not meant? Perhaps I'm misunderstanding his point. Can forensic science mean safeguards can be built to avoid miscarriages of justice?